From b0e050d10d12c42be031c34822117cfd3c5a0ea7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Karl Palsson <karlp@etactica.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:44:03 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] stm32: can: fix can_reset()

Clearly staging branch testers weren't testing.
Also, clearly the separation of RST_ bits and RCC_ bits is a complicated
annoyance.

Fixes: d9615a2eb728 update to modern include apis
---
 lib/stm32/can.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/stm32/can.c b/lib/stm32/can.c
index a1447d22..44a6cd65 100644
--- a/lib/stm32/can.c
+++ b/lib/stm32/can.c
@@ -63,10 +63,10 @@ can_reg_base.
 void can_reset(uint32_t canport)
 {
 	if (canport == CAN1) {
-		rcc_periph_reset_pulse(RCC_CAN1);
+		rcc_periph_reset_pulse(RST_CAN1);
 	} else {
 #if defined(BX_CAN2_BASE)
-		rcc_periph_reset_pulse(RCC_CAN2);
+		rcc_periph_reset_pulse(RST_CAN2);
 #endif
 	}
 }