When compiling with all warnings enabled, some defines can lead to
warning due to missing unsigned type suffix:
warning: integer overflow in expression [-Woverflow]
This fix should not affected behavior at all, since calculation with
such overflows lead to the same actual address when writing to that
location. However, it makes the warning disappear and also defines
the right data type for a memory location.
Add memorymap entries for ST calibration data, the vref internal, and the temp
sensor at 30C and 110C for the parts that provide this data.
F1 and F2 do not appear to have this anywhere.
STM32L1 has a different set of offsets, not just a different base
address, so we can't have common registers definitions. Also, out of
F0,F1,F2,F3,F4,L1, only the F1 has the odd note about 2x16bit registers
and 2x32bit registers with one 16bit register marked as "This field
value is also reserved for a future feature." Therefore, replace the
awkward reading out as multiple words and just copy them in.
F0,F2,F3,F4 were missing definitions altogether.
This does _not_ attempt to address the problem of the mismatched base
addresses for Medium+ and High Density L1 parts.
