53de290fda
Thoughts: should this be a "sam0" family rather than samd? (Much like Atmel's own software package lumps all the cortex-m0+ devices in one family) This was enough to get a basic blinky working at least.
26 lines
464 B
JSON
26 lines
464 B
JSON
{
|
|
"irqs": [
|
|
"pm",
|
|
"sysctrl",
|
|
"wdt",
|
|
"rtc",
|
|
"eic",
|
|
"nvmctrl",
|
|
"dmac",
|
|
"reserved1",
|
|
"evsys",
|
|
"sercom0",
|
|
"sercom1",
|
|
"sercom2",
|
|
"tcc0",
|
|
"tc1",
|
|
"tc2",
|
|
"adc",
|
|
"ac",
|
|
"dac",
|
|
"ptc"
|
|
],
|
|
"partname_humanreadable": "Atmel SAMD series",
|
|
"partname_doxygen": "SAMD",
|
|
"includeguard": "LIBOPENCM3_SAMD_NVIC_H"
|
|
} |